About the Tutorials Forum

[Negative]

Just to get some things straight:

Originally, this forum was meant for AntiOnline users to post ORIGINAL (http://www.antionline.com/announcement.php?s=&forumid=59) tutorials that they've written about a variety of subjects. If you browse the tutorials, you might notice that 172 out of 297 are not original tutorials. Those 172 tutorials DO give credit where credit's due though (most of them without having to ask, some with having to expose the 'scam' first). That's the only demand if you decide to post a tutorial you didn't write yourself (same goes for news, articles, jokes,... btw). The reasons for this are simple and covered before already...

I reviewed all tutorials in the Tutorials Forum Index (http://www.antionline.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=133897) : all of the 125 tutorials on that list are original tutorials (I also added all the authors' names). If your tutorial is not on that list, it means you didn't write it yourself (or I missed your tutorial... PM me if that's the case).

Suggestions/questions are always welcome...

[MartinBishop]

A requirement to tag unoriginal tutorials in the subject line with something like {UO} would be nice. Also it'd clear up a lot of confusion if people who post tutorials from the net would just link them rather than copy&pasting the whole thing in. It usually messes up the formatting anyways.

[PhirePhreak]

Thank you for setting a standard Neg. We're in desperate need of that.

Namárie,
--PhirePhreak

[jethro]

/me applauds.

[ahmedmamuda]

Here we go again!
good work Neg